The Wise Governance

Document Type : reserch

Authors

1 Ph.D. Department of Public Administration, Islamic Azad University, Science and Research Branch, Tehran, Iran

2 Master of Public Administration, Young Researchers and Elite Club, Qaemshahr, Iran

Abstract

The governance, in the age of accelerated changes, turbulences, complexities, and uncertainties, is one of the main challenges of states and governments; so that the good governance and other governance concepts' are not able to cope with the challenges of predatory globalization, international corporate capitalism, and meet the demands and needs of the various nations and governments. This research is trying to represent the concept of "wise governance" as an effective governance system by relying on the concept of "wisdom." In this research, theorizing methodology is used and the contemporary literature relevant to various and important forms of governance and public administration in the relevant papers and books has been reviewed and analyzed. Wise governance is metagovernance and has various characteristics and dimensions that is referred to: comprehensiveness, proactiveness, bilateralism and multilateralism, interactional and networked, beneficiary of citizen science, political wisdom and wise politics, the community of wisdom inquiry, wise and distributed leadership, diversity and complexity, the culture of contradictions, the fundamental principles of honor, wisdom, and expediency, mutual trust and respect, pursuance the common good, governability, and realization of the wise society and world. The wise governance is an inclusive of the rational-and religious-and ethics-and values-based approaches to governance and relied on wise assumptions relevant to society, economy, culture, environment, and politics that are interconnected with each other. The wise governance provides a diverse, integrated, interactional, networked, participatory, adaptive, empowered, creative, and innovative system for governance that pursues the common good and meet public demands, and in turn, promotes the governability. Finally, a discussion and some recommendations will be provided.

Keywords


نهج‌البلاغه (1386). ترجمه حجت ­الاسلام محمد دشتی، قم: انتشارات دارالمعارف.
ترکمنی­ آذر، پروین (1390). اندیشه غالب بر نوشته ­های تاریخی دوره سلجوقی در ایران: کلام اشعری و حکمت عملی، پژوهشنامه تاریخ تمدن اسلامی، 44 (2)، 31- 51.
خواجه نصیرالدین طوسی، محمد بن محمد بن حسن ( 1413ق). اخلاق ناصری. تهران: انتشارات علمیه اسلامیه.
دانشگاه تهران (1396). تدوین سند دانشگاه حکمت ­بنیان؛ از مبانی نظری تا راهبردی، دبیرخانه شورای­عالی انقلاب فرهنگی.
رحمانی، محمد (1385). مصلحت در حکومت نبوی (احکام حکومتی)، حکومت اسلامی، 4 (11)، 120-94.
صمدی­ میارکلائی، حمزه و صمدی ­میارکلائی، حسین (1394). در مسیر نظریۀ رهبری حکیمانه اسلامی، نظریه‌های اجتماعی متفکران مسلمان، 5 (1)، 163- 201.
صمدی­ میارکلائی، حسین؛ صمدی­ میارکلائی، حمزه و بابایی، عباس (1391). ضرورت و اهمیت نقش هلال احمر در حوادث و بلایای طبیعی در مدیریت بحران، فصلنامه علمی و پژوهشی امداد و نجات، 4 (3)، 94- 107.
صمدی­ میارکلائی، حمزه و صمدی­ میارکلائی، حسین (1396). روندها و روش‌شناسی‌های پژوهشی در مطالعات مدیریت دولتی: تحلیل محتوای نشریات برتر در یک دوره پنج‌ساله (2014-2010)،  فصلنامه رسالت مدیریت دولتی، 8، 99- 116.
صمدی­م یارکلائی، حمزه و صمدی­ میارکلائی، حسین (1397). مقیاس سنجش رهبری حکیمانه در محیط کار (WLS): توسعه و اعتبارسنجی یک مقیاس چندبعدی، دوفصلنامه اسلام و مدیریت، 7 (13)، 30- 45.
صمدی­ میارکلائی، حمزه و صمدی­ میارکلائی، حسین (1398). در مسیر دانشگاه حکیمانه: سومین انقلاب علمی‌دانشگاهی، سیاست‌نامه علم و فناوری، 9 (2)، 43- 66.
صمدی­ میارکلائی، حمزه؛ فقیهی، ابوالحسن؛ دانش­فرد، کرم­اله (1397). درک نقش ارزش­های فردی و اجتماعی مدیران در اجرای خط­مشی ­های مصوب در سازمان­های دولتی ایران، فصلنامه مدیریت دولتی، 10 (4)، 529- 562.
Adizes, I. K. (17 March 2017). Why We Need Mutual Trust and Respect? Huffington Post. https://www.ichakadizes.com/why-we-need-mutual-trust-and-respect/
Ackoff, R. L. (1989). From data to wisdom. Journal of Applied Systems Analysis, 16(1), 3-9.
Ansell, C. (2019). The Protective State. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Ansell, C., Sørensen, E., & Torfing, J. (2020). The COVID-19 pandemic as a game changer for public administration and leadership? The need for robust governance responses to turbulent problems. Public Management Review, 23(7), 949-960.
Aristotle. (2009). The Nicomachean Ethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Baltes, P. B., & Kunzmann, U. (2003) Wisdom. The Psychologist, 16, 131-132.
Bennett, N., & Lemoine, G. J. (2014). What a difference a word makes: Understanding threats to performance in a VUCA world. Business Horizons57(3), 311-317.
Bennett, S. E. (2017). Applying Public Opinion in Governance: The Uses and Future of Public Opinion in Managing Government. Switzerland: Springer International Publishing.
Brinkerhoff, D. W., & Brinkerhoff, J. M. (2015). Public sector management reform in developing countries: Perspectives beyond NPM orthodoxy. Public Administration and Development35(4), 222-237.
Carlile, P. R., & Christensen, C. M. (2005). The cycles of theory building in management research. Division of Research, Harvard Business School.
Cornforth, C. (ed.) (2003). The governance of public and non-profit organisations. What do boards do? London: Routledge.
Daly, H. E., Cobb, John B., & Cobb, C. W. (1994). For the Common Good: Redirecting the Economy Toward Community, the Environment, and a Sustainable Future. Boston: Beacon Press.
Denhardt, R. B., & Denhardt, J. V. (2000). The new public service: Serving rather than steering. Public Administration Review60(6), 549-559.
Dong, L. (2015). Public Administration Theories: Instrumental and Value Rationality. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
Drucker, P. F. (2002). The Effective Executive. United States: HarperCollins Publishers Inc.
Dunleavy, P., Margetts, H., Bastow, S., & Tinkler, J. (2006). New public management is dead—long live digital-era governance. Journal of public administration research and theory16(3), 467-494.
Etheredge, L. S. (1992). Wisdom and good judgment in politics. Political psychology, 13(3), 497-516.
Etheredge, L. S. (2005). Wisdom in Public Policy. In Sternberg, R. J. Jordan, J. (Eds.). A Handbook of Wisdom: Psychological Perspectives (Pp. 297-328). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Farazmand, A. (1999). Globalization and Public Administration. Public Administration Review, 59(6), 509-522.
Farazmand, A. (2004). Sound Governance: Policy and Administrative Innovations. Praeger Publishers, Greenwood Publishing Group, Inc., UK: London.
Farazmand, A. (2009). Building administrative capacity for the age of rapid globalization: A modest prescription for the twenty‐first century. Public Administration Review69(6), 1007-1020.
Farazmand, A. (2010). Bureaucracy and democracy: a theoretical analysis. Public Organization Review, 10(3), 245–258.
Farazmand, A. (2012). Sound governance: Engaging citizens through collaborative organizations. Public Organization Review12(3), 223-241.
Farazmand, A. (2015). Governance in the Age of Globalization: Challenges and Opportunities for South and Southeast Asia. In Jamil, I., Aminuzzaman, S. M., & Haque, S. T. M. (Eds.). Governance in South, Southeast, and East Asia: Trends, Issues and Challenges (Vol. 15) (pp. 11-26). Switzerland: Springer International Publishing.
Farazmand, A. (2017). Governance reforms: The good, the bad, and the ugly; and the sound: Examining the past and exploring the future of public organizations. Public Organization Review17(4), 595-617.
Fukuyama, F. (2013). What Is Governance?. CGD Working Paper 314. Washington, DC: Center for Global Development.
Gisselquist, R. M. (2012). Good governance as a concept, and why this matters for development policy (No. 2012/30). WIDER Working Paper.
Goede, M. (2011). The wise society: beyond the knowledge economy. Foresight, 13(1), 36-45.
Goodsell, C. T. (2006). A new vision for public administration. Public Administration Review66(4), 623-635.
Grindle, M. S. (2017). Good governance, RIP: A critique and an alternative. Governance30(1), 17-22.
Grossmann, I. (2017). Wisdom in Context. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 12(2), 233–257.
Hammond, M. (2018). ‘An interesting paper but not sufficiently theoretical’: What does theorising in social research look like?. Methodological Innovations11(2), 2059799118787756.
Hartley, J., Alford, J., Hughes, O., & Yates, S. (2015). Public value and political astuteness in the work of public managers: The art of the possible. Public Administration93(1), 195-211.
Hood, C. (1991). A public management for all seasons? Public Administration, 69(1), 3-19.
Hughes, O. E. (2003). Public management and administration: an introduction. 3rd Edition. New York: Palgrave Macmillan Ltd.
Intezari, A. (2016). Practical wisdom through sustainability: A Meta-approach. In A. Habisch & R. Schmidpeter (Eds.), Cultural roots of sustainable management: Practical wisdom and corporate social responsibility (pp. 23-37). Switzerland: Springer.
Jen Su, A. (16 December 2019). Do You Really Trust Your Team? (And Do They Trust You?). Harvard Business Review.
Jessop, B. (2016). Territory, politics, governance and multispatial metagovernance. Territory, politics, governance4(1), 8-32.
Kessler, E. H., & Bailey, J. R. (Eds.). (2007). Handbook of Organizational and Managerial Wisdom. USA, Los Angeles: Sage Publications.
Kooiman, J. (1993). Governance and governability: using complexity, dynamics and diversity. In Kooiman, J. (Eds.). Modern governance: new government-society interactions (pp. 35-48). Sage publication.
Kooiman, J. (2010). Governance and governability. In Osborne, S. P. (Eds.). The New Public Governance: Emerging Perspectives on the Theory and Practice (pp. 72-86). New York: Routledge.
Kooiman, J., & Jentoft, S. (2009). Meta‐governance: values, norms and principles, and the making of hard choices. Public administration87(4), 818-836.
Lægreid, P. (2016). Public Administration Theories: Instrumental and Value Rationality. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 26(3), 588-590.
Lampropoulou, M., & Oikonomou, G. (2018). Theoretical models of public administration and patterns of state reform in Greece. International Review of Administrative Sciences84(1), 101-121.
Lewenstein, B. V. (2016). Can we understand citizen science? Journal of Science Communication, 15(01), E.
Lewin, K. (1951). Problems of research in social psychology. In Cartwright, D. (ed.), Field theory in social science: selected theoretical papers (pp. 155–169). New York: Harper & Row.
Lewin, L. (1991). Self-interest and public interest in Western politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Maxwell, N. (2007). From knowledge to wisdom: the need for an academic revolution. London Review of Education, 5(2), 97–115.
Maxwell, N. (2014). How Universities Can Help Create a Wiser World: The Urgent Need for an Academic Revolution. USA: Ingram Book Company.
Meuleman, L. (2008). Public Management and the Metagovernance of Hierarchies, Networks and Markets: The Feasibility of Designing and Managing Governance Style Combinations. Heidelberg: Physica-Verlag.
Mick, D. G., Bateman, T. S., & Lutz, R. J. (2009). Wisdom: Exploring the pinnacle of human virtues as a central link from micromarketing to macromarketing. Journal of Macromarketing29(2), 98-118.
Mills, C. W. (1959). The sociological imagination. New York: Oxford University Press.
Milward, H. B., & Provan, K. G. (2000). Governing the hollow state. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory10(2), 359-380.
Moore, M. H. (1995). Creating public value: Strategic management in government. Harvard: Harvard University Press.
Nonaka, I., & Takeuchi, H. (2011). The Wise Leader. Harvard Business Review, 89(5), 57-67.
Nonaka, I., & Takeuchi, H. (2019). The Wise Company: How Companies Create Continuous Innovation. Oxford university press.
Nonaka, I., & Takeuchi, H. (2021). Humanizing strategy. Long Range Planning, 54(4), 102070.
OECD. (1995). Participatory Development and Good Governance. Paris: OECD.
Osborne, D., Gaebler, T. (1992). Reinventing Government: How the Entrepreneurial Spirit is Transforming the Public Sector. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
Osborne, S. P. (2006). The New Public Governance? Public Management Review, 8(3), 377-387.
Osborne, S. P. (ed.) (2010). The new public governance: emerging perspectives on the theory and practice of public governance. New York: Routledge.
Peters, B. G. (2010). Meta-governance and public management. In Osborne, S. P. (Eds.). The new public governance: Emerging perspectives on the theory and practice (pp. 52-67). New York: Routledge.
Pollitt, C. (1990). Managerialism and the Public Service: The Anglo-American Experience. Cambridge, MA: Basil Blackwell.
Pollitt, C., & Bouckaert, G. (2004). Public Management Reform: A Comparative Analysis – New Public Management, Governance, and the Neo-Weberian State. 1st Edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Poluha, E., & Rosendahl, M. (2002). Contesting 'Good' Governance: Crosscultural Perspectives on Representation, Accountability and Public Space. 1st Edition. London: Routledge
Rhodes, R.A.W. (1996). The new governance: governing without government. Political studies44(4), 652-667.
Rhodes, R. A. W. (2007). Understanding Governance – Ten years on. Organization
Studies, 28, 1243-1264.
Rhodes, R. A. W. (2012). Waves of governance. In Levi-Faur, D. (Ed.). (2012). The Oxford handbook of governance (pp. 33-48). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Roberts, A. (2020). The third and fatal shock: How pandemic killed the millennial paradigm. Public Administration Review, 80(4), 603-609.
Rooney, D. (2013). Grounding organizational wisdom theory: Ontology, epistemology, and methodology. In Kupers, W., & D. J. Pauleen (Ed.) A handbook of practical wisdom: Leadership, organization and integral business practice (pp. 79-98). UK: Gowen Publishing Limited.
Rooney, D., & McKenna, B. (2008). Wisdom in public administration: Looking for a sociology of wise practice. Public Administration Review68(4), 709-721.
Rooney, D., McKenna, B., & Liesch, P. (2010). Wisdom and management in the knowledge economy. New York: Routledge.
Shoemaker, P. J., Tankard Jr, J. W., & Lasorsa, D. L. (2003). How to build social science theories. Sage publications.
Stack, L. (2016). Doing the right things right: how the effective executive spends time. Oakland: Berrett-Koehler Publishers.
Statler, M., & Roos, J. (2007). Everyday strategic preparedness: The role of practical wisdom in organizations. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Stenmark, M. (1995). Rationality in science, religion, and everyday life: A critical evaluation of four models of rationality. Notre Dame, Indiana: University of Notre Dame Press.
Swedberg, R. (2012). Theorizing in sociology and social science: Turning to the context of discovery. Theory and society41(1), 1-40.
't Hart, P. (2011). Evaluating Public Leadership: Towards an Assessment Framework. Public Money & Management, 31(5), 323-330.
Thiele, L. P. (2006). The heart of judgment: Practical wisdom, neuroscience, and narrative. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Țiclău, T., Hințea, C., & Andrianu, B. (2020). Adaptive and Turbulent Governance. Ways of Governing that Foster Resilience. The Case of the COVID-19 Pandemic. Transylvanian Review of Administrative Sciences16(SI), 167-182.
Torfing, J., Peters, B. G., Pierre, J., & Sørensen, E. (2012). Interactive governance: Advancing the paradigm. Oxford University Press on Demand.
Torfing, J., Andersen, L. B., Greve, C., & Klausen, K. K. (2020). Public Governance Paradigms: Competing and Co-existing. Edward Elgar Publishing.
Van de Ven, A. H. (2007). Engaged scholarship: A guide for organizational and social research. Oxford University Press on Demand.
Weiss, T. G. (2000). Governance, Good Governance and Global Governance: Conceptual and Actual Challenges. Third World Quarterly, Vol. 21, No. 5, pp. 795-814.
Worboys, G. L., Lockwood, M., Kothari, A., Feary, S., & Pulsford, I. (Eds.). (2015). Protected area governance and management. ANU Press.
World Health Organization (WHO) (2020). Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Situation Report, 45.
Zeleny, M. (2006). From knowledge to wisdom: On being informed and knowledgeable, becoming wise and ethical. International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making, 5(04), 751-762.